![]() Re-publishing it through the foundation will – in general – only lead to unnecessary duplication and may be rejected during the app store's review. Where open source apps exist, the app's original maintainer has likely already published it. ![]() Such a foundation would also face the following difficulties: To the best of my knowledge, there is no such foundation. This should be a valid model because only the foundation pays the fee for developer account, and it should be able to publish unlimited number of applications. The application homepage directs user to install the application in App Store.The foundation publishes the application under its own developer account.More communication can happen in this stage (such as discussing how the foundation receives update). It can do this with help of community, such as publishing the request and wait for comments. The foundation examines the application, such as checking license compatibility, obvious malicious content, popularity, and user feedback.The foundation checks out the code on some publicly available repository (such as GitHub).Note that only the current maintainers can submit such request if the project isn’t maintained then it shouldn’t be published. The community (current maintainers) makes request to the foundation about publishing an application to App Store.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |